|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 20, 2021 21:02:24 GMT -5
Post by Twins GM (Brandon) on Mar 20, 2021 21:02:24 GMT -5
Yankees trade:
Cristian Javier (SP Hou) Milb
Daniel Johnson (OF CLE) Milb
Royals Trade:
Marcell Ozuna 2021: 12.8M 2022: 16M 2023: 17.2M 2024: 14.8M
Yankees and Royals agreed to trade.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
NYY/KC
Mar 20, 2021 22:41:12 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2021 22:41:12 GMT -5
Looks to me that Royals looking to move a contract that saves him cap in the long run.
|
|
|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 20, 2021 22:49:23 GMT -5
Post by Athletics GM (Josh) on Mar 20, 2021 22:49:23 GMT -5
For a top 50 dynasty player that is a very reasonable contract. I'd like to hear from Royals as to why he would want to make this trade.
|
|
|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 20, 2021 23:39:29 GMT -5
Post by Jay - Reds on Mar 20, 2021 23:39:29 GMT -5
We are going down a Slippery slope here if we start vetoing trades. I see no evidence of Collusion. Let’s not be stupid!
|
|
|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 21, 2021 6:17:07 GMT -5
Post by visor on Mar 21, 2021 6:17:07 GMT -5
because I am in a rebuild and getting rid of salary and got what I deem a fair return in a controllable arm and bat that could yield a good return. This is a money league and I don't like throwing $20 away knowing I'm not going to win but it is also a dynasty league with a cap and having Ozuna on my team at the salary I have doesn't make sense. I can buy 2-3 players with the money I am paying him...
On a side note I only had two offers for him and one had me paying his salary...
|
|
|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 21, 2021 6:19:47 GMT -5
Post by visor on Mar 21, 2021 6:19:47 GMT -5
For the record, the fact that someone can protest a trade and not be exposed to those involved seems ridiculous, the fact that I have to defend a trade and the party responsible for the veto doesn't have to say anything or state why they don't think the trade should go through is ridiculous as well.
|
|
|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 21, 2021 11:01:57 GMT -5
Post by Steve (Padres) on Mar 21, 2021 11:01:57 GMT -5
I don't disagree with Visor here. I think if there's a protest the burden of proof shouldn't have to sit only with the trade participants, whoever initiates the protest should also have to provide reasoning for protest.
In regards to this trade, I personally think it's weighted to the Ozuna side of the deal but I don't think it's so one-sided that it would require a protest. Actually pretty surprised to see this being protested.
|
|
|
|
NYY/KC
Mar 21, 2021 11:54:58 GMT -5
Post by Trey - Astros GM on Mar 21, 2021 11:54:58 GMT -5
Not bad enough to warrant this imo. Sure, it's a good amount unbalanced on talent and 2021 expectations, but factoring in money owed, age expectations, and 6 years cost control on Javier who looks like at least a solid #3 and it feels close enough.
|
|
